One of the key ways a rape culture is cemented is through the media's lens. How a news outlet reports on and describes sexual violence is critical. Sometimes, the mainstream media's refusal to take rape seriously is overt, such as when they report on a victim's sexual history, clothes, or alcohol intake.
In the case of today's bulletin from RTE, '
Gang attacks couples in Co Louth', about a shocking attack on two couples last night, it's a little more subtle. Behold the opening paragraphs:
Two couples were injured when they were attacked by a gang in Co Louth in the early hours of this morning.
The incident occurred in the Townley Hall area between Slane and Drogheda at around 4.30am this morning.
The two couples had been in a car when they were attacked by a gang and beaten up. One woman was allegedly raped.
When somebody is mugged on the street or robbed in their home, when they are pickpocketed in a bar or glassed in a nightclub, the incident is reported as fact. But a woman is
allegedly raped. Because she might be lying, of course. Never mind that the rate of false reporting for rape is roughly the same (2%) as for all those other crimes.
I'm not talking, just to be clear, about describing someone accused of a crime. Until a conviction is obtained, it's only right and proper that someone should be reported as 'the
alleged mugger' or 'the
alleged rapist'. But that's not what went on in this article. In almost the same breath, RTE presented the violent attack on two men and two women as questioned, while the sexual assault of one of those women is only 'alleged'.
We don't pretend that people who are hospitalised by violent non-sexual attacks have made up their assault, or inflicted their injuries themselves. Sexual attacks should be treated the same way.
If one were to be as charitable as possible, it could perhaps be hoped that the RTE newsroom only had confirmation from the hospital of the non-sexual violence, and that the rape had not been confirmed. But this is not a particularly reasonable explanation. Why would the hospital, or the gardai, not confirm all details of the attack at the same time? If the story of the rape is just a rumour, why publish it at all until confirmed? Why permit it to be written about in the fashion above, which suggests that the non-sexual aspects are certain but the rape only an 'allegation'? Treating sexual violence in such a hamfisted manner is inexcusable.